Overreaction thy name is LJ
May. 30th, 2007 10:44 amAfter closing down or temperarily suspending both user accounts as well as comms due to pedophilistic charges in said comms and by users, LiveJournal is now overreacting. While I still applauded LiveJournal's consequent handling of the pedophile comms, now all I can do is shaking my head over some of the antics LJ is pulling due to the Warriors For Innocence shenanigans (which incidentally are on blogger.com. Anyone know if WFI ever did a thorough search through the blogger.com comms and users? I doubt it.)
ETA: The wonderful and ever suspicious
thelana looked a bit further into their pages and found some very interesting things: read here
Anyway, now LiveJournal - after closing a comm which was dedicated to Nabokov's work, esp. Lolita as well as several LJ's by Gothic Lolitas (rolls eyes) AND yaoi manga comms (fanfic etc.), they are now moving onward to delete questionable user icons. OI!!
What will be next? Certain dorama, manga and Johnny's icons prohibited?? *pets her icon of Tsu-kun and Taku-chan*
Child safety is good and nice, but this is going too far IMHO. Instead of doing a panicky purge every few years or so when someone is actually threatening to sue, keep track of certain comms and tighten the security. But this is ridiculous.
ETA: The wonderful and ever suspicious
Anyway, now LiveJournal - after closing a comm which was dedicated to Nabokov's work, esp. Lolita as well as several LJ's by Gothic Lolitas (rolls eyes) AND yaoi manga comms (fanfic etc.), they are now moving onward to delete questionable user icons. OI!!
What will be next? Certain dorama, manga and Johnny's icons prohibited?? *pets her icon of Tsu-kun and Taku-chan*
Child safety is good and nice, but this is going too far IMHO. Instead of doing a panicky purge every few years or so when someone is actually threatening to sue, keep track of certain comms and tighten the security. But this is ridiculous.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 02:01 pm (UTC)Hmm.. This is good from one point of view (you know what I think about the subject as a whole, and some of JE photo sessions of their teen boys). Yaoi? Well, personally I hate yaoi and will not cry about it at all...
But do Live Journal also battle with Nabokov's "Lolita", too? This is a bit absurdly. I don't like this novel nor this writer in general, but "Lolita" is a world literature classics already - it's s bit too late to make a fuss about it. IMHO
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 06:44 pm (UTC)http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/00099q31
http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/0009fe90
http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/0009abr2
http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/0009b0ed
http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/0009dzqa
http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/0009fe90
http://pics.livejournal.com/nihon81/pic/0009g4hx
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 09:43 pm (UTC)LJ really made a big mistake bypurging ALL comms and ljs using certain trigger words as they not only deleted literary comms but also child abuse support groups and what not. With this action they labeled anyone who is now with a deleted comm or LJ as a pedophile :s
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 10:15 pm (UTC)But in any case, I'm sure, if they insist on this strange politic, we, common LJ users, will have to be smarter at the end - and to find a way to avoid stupid rules.
Well, he-he, may be this is my typically Russian "untamed" soul is speaking now, so stop ears: if the rule is stupid, it should be avoided. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-05-30 11:33 pm (UTC)But it's true I really was tempted all day to put some trigger words into my profile, but I chickened out at the last minute. What was LJ Management thinking? Or probably not thinking at all :s
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:07 pm (UTC)Well that is what they wanted to do but I think htey have seen the errors of their ways and have changed tactics. Atm they are re-instating some LJs.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 08:56 pm (UTC)I also like some NewS and KAT-TUN stuff, but I would never actually support them to fill Johnny's pockets with even more money (apart from the CDs I buy of SMAP).
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:00 pm (UTC)Yea. they aren't worth enough for me to pay for at all. That will go to my Korean babies ♥ hehehehehe.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 09:37 pm (UTC)I posted about SMAP and their songs as well as a short vid of skits form their show here (http://scottishlass.livejournal.com/225713.html).
What is so funny is that they did it first and now all the other kouhei groups (younger bands) have to do the same, so KAT-TUN have comedy shows, T&T, Arashi etc. But SMAP really takes it further, they even take the mikey out of themselves just for laughs. I don't see KAT-TUN or the other youngsters doing that. Perhaps it's the age, or perhaps SMAP is so much more than just an idol group as each member is also a good actor and artist in general. Yah, I'm biased :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 10:29 pm (UTC)also. kind of ashamed to say. the only smap thing i know really is -just- that Justin thing.. haha...
so maybe i will try and look into your post. but right now my mind inst in the right..set? haha. i worded that weird. anyways. when i am in the mood for some new music ill check them out 8D. though. my interest in one band hardly ever lasts longer then 1 or 2 weeks. haha.
ps. we really get off topic don't we? haha.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 12:37 am (UTC)